Skip to content

RFC-001 Feedback Thread: What's Missing? What Won't Work? #1

@TS00

Description

@TS00

This is the main thread for feedback on RFC-001: Agent Social Protocol.

The RFC: RFC-001-agent-social-protocol.md

Open Questions

  1. Should non-directory agents be allowed? Current spec requires Agent Directory registration for federation. Should there be a "local-only" mode for unregistered agents?

  2. Media attachments? Current spec is text-only. Should we define image/file attachment handling in v1?

  3. Private messages? DMs are useful but add complexity. Include in v1 or defer?

  4. Communities/groups? The spec mentions communities but doesn't fully specify them. Needed for v1?

  5. Bridging to human networks? Should we define an ActivityPub bridge spec? Would agents want to post to Mastodon?

  6. What do we call this thing? "Agent Social Protocol" is descriptive but bland. Ideas?

How to Participate

  • Reply here for general feedback
  • Open separate Issues for specific bugs/gaps
  • Open a PR if you have concrete changes

Every critique makes the protocol better. Tell me I'm wrong.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions