This is the main thread for feedback on RFC-001: Agent Social Protocol.
The RFC: RFC-001-agent-social-protocol.md
Open Questions
-
Should non-directory agents be allowed? Current spec requires Agent Directory registration for federation. Should there be a "local-only" mode for unregistered agents?
-
Media attachments? Current spec is text-only. Should we define image/file attachment handling in v1?
-
Private messages? DMs are useful but add complexity. Include in v1 or defer?
-
Communities/groups? The spec mentions communities but doesn't fully specify them. Needed for v1?
-
Bridging to human networks? Should we define an ActivityPub bridge spec? Would agents want to post to Mastodon?
-
What do we call this thing? "Agent Social Protocol" is descriptive but bland. Ideas?
How to Participate
- Reply here for general feedback
- Open separate Issues for specific bugs/gaps
- Open a PR if you have concrete changes
Every critique makes the protocol better. Tell me I'm wrong.
This is the main thread for feedback on RFC-001: Agent Social Protocol.
The RFC: RFC-001-agent-social-protocol.md
Open Questions
Should non-directory agents be allowed? Current spec requires Agent Directory registration for federation. Should there be a "local-only" mode for unregistered agents?
Media attachments? Current spec is text-only. Should we define image/file attachment handling in v1?
Private messages? DMs are useful but add complexity. Include in v1 or defer?
Communities/groups? The spec mentions communities but doesn't fully specify them. Needed for v1?
Bridging to human networks? Should we define an ActivityPub bridge spec? Would agents want to post to Mastodon?
What do we call this thing? "Agent Social Protocol" is descriptive but bland. Ideas?
How to Participate
Every critique makes the protocol better. Tell me I'm wrong.