Replies: 4 comments 14 replies
|
The chromium project on the other side has rejected support for JXL: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1178058#c84 |
|
Since other leading vendors like Adobe, Apple and Samsung are fully supporting JPGXL formats, its about time to add it to this otherwise excellent library. Who gives a damn about chromium's decision? They want to force the world to use WEBP, which isnt bad, but not the last word on image formats. |
|
Is there any update on the current state of this? |
|
I would definitely love this. Unlike JXS which is patented, JXL is completely royalty free, thanks to Google's perpetual, worldwide, royalty‑free patent license covering its official implementation. I found the reference software (libjxl) here https://github.com/libjxl/libjxl/tree/main and by this point I definitely understand what the mass of "complexity" means here. There's a total of 109,286 lines of code. Given that I worked in depth with multimedia before (and in fact, currently in progress of writing video codecs in C#), I believe I have enough experience to use libjxl as reference and implement JXL support for ImageSharp, though I'm not sure if JXL support is planned in the first place. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Apple just announced (last month) they will be support JXL very soon.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPEG_XL
Discussed briefly in this idea as well but wanted to separate it out - #1320
All reactions