Skip to content

Refactor investment schemas #145

@josephmckinsey

Description

@josephmckinsey

There are some significant issues as discussed in #138 on how the investment tables currently work:

  • overly restrictive UNIQUE constraints
  • not enough tables for different supply technology types (storage, etc)
  • missing columns

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type
No fields configured for issues without a type.

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions