-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 185
Add tests for how operation models affect flows #1091
Copy link
Copy link
Open
Labels
ideas-listIdeas that would be nice to do but aren't scheduled. Lower priority than back-log.Ideas that would be nice to do but aren't scheduled. Lower priority than back-log.packageFor pull requests and features that are to do with the FLORIS as a python packageFor pull requests and features that are to do with the FLORIS as a python package
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
ideas-listIdeas that would be nice to do but aren't scheduled. Lower priority than back-log.Ideas that would be nice to do but aren't scheduled. Lower priority than back-log.packageFor pull requests and features that are to do with the FLORIS as a python packageFor pull requests and features that are to do with the FLORIS as a python package
Type
Fields
Give feedbackNo fields configured for issues without a type.
There was a bug recently identified in how flows respond to the
AWCTurbineoperation model #1089; @gyalla also provided a bugfix in #1090, and I was going to add a test to confirm that the expected behavior occurs going forward, but I realized we don't have a set of tests for how the flows are affected by changing operation models. Perhaps this is something that should be added to the regression tests---the reg tests current test yaw misalignments with theCosineLossoperation model, but not other types of control.