-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
multisem wafer 60 and 61 first pass #16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
trautmane
wants to merge
312
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
multisem
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…mline logic with sets
…ng file structure
…oop; no need to sort: already sorted;
…also using blockFactorXY 1 instead of default 8 to avoid OOM with larger 1024,1024,maxZ blocks
…ghbors parameter, and bump up xyNeighborFactor from 0.3 to 0.6 to fix missing match problem for wafer 60 slab 399 MFOVs that have a larger overlap
…rrection code. The basicpy dependency required a much newer pydantic. I updated the pydantic dependency, but needed to remove the fibsem-tools dependency because it limits pydantic versions. We don't need fibsem-tools for multi-SEM, but this will make it more difficult to merge the multisem branch back to the main branch.
… 10 layer 'n' files with wafer 'any' files
…alignment.match=WARN
…that did not work as expected
…restore a small number of render stacks from a much larger mongodb dump
….0.6-SNAPSHOT.jar
…ET to AGGREGATED_CONSENSUS_SETS. Although the filter methods for crossPass1 and 2 were also changed for November 2025 tests of w61_s109 problem area A, crossPass1 and 2 were left as SINGLE_SET in this commit because of concern that AGGREGATED might cause problems with resin MFOVs across z layers.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
My first pass at changes to handle wafers 60 and 61 using @templiert 's new xlog data and utilities ...