You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As I started to use bmad, I have been wondering about how it differs from openspec, so far I feel like the main difference is for sequencing big set of changes.
Suppose you need to work on a big "Epic" with many changes and some of those changes require a specific order of implementation, how do you tackle this with openspec (apart from applying each changes orderly by hand) ?
Does anybody use openspec within an agentic workflow where separated changes are taken care of by multiple subagents in an orderly way ?
Actually within one change, tasks are worked on in order if I recall, so one openspec change may cover an unlimited perimeter ? But that way parallelism becomes harder.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
As I started to use bmad, I have been wondering about how it differs from openspec, so far I feel like the main difference is for sequencing big set of changes.
Suppose you need to work on a big "Epic" with many changes and some of those changes require a specific order of implementation, how do you tackle this with openspec (apart from applying each changes orderly by hand) ?
Does anybody use openspec within an agentic workflow where separated changes are taken care of by multiple subagents in an orderly way ?
Actually within one change, tasks are worked on in order if I recall, so one openspec change may cover an unlimited perimeter ? But that way parallelism becomes harder.
All reactions