V2-SC-016 — Implement Dispute Opening and Challenge Bond Custody
Overview
Implement one valid challenge per claim, exact challenge timing, bond locking, and transition into Disputed.
Problem Context
A provisional result must be challengeable without letting spam or privileged actors halt claims for free. Challenge bonds need the same protected custody guarantees as verifier stake.
This issue belongs to V2-EPIC-SC-001 — Canonical Contract Topology and Deployment. Existing repository issues are historical only; their titles, labels, closure state, or partial implementations do not satisfy this issue.
Technical Scope
- Accept challenges only during ChallengeWindow and before the frozen deadline.
- Lock the configured bond asset and amount through StakeVault.
- Record challenger, challenged outcome, bond lock, appeal parameters, and dispute identifier.
- Reject recursive or duplicate challenges and emit DisputeOpened.
- Transition the claim into Disputed atomically.
The contributor must begin by auditing current files that overlap this scope. Reusable logic may be retained only when it conforms to the governing V2 interfaces, events, authority boundaries, and tests. The pull request must identify reused, replaced, and deprecated paths.
Security and Integrity Requirements
- No dispute record may exist without a successful bond lock.
- Prevent governance, guardian, or treasury bypass of bond requirements.
- Protect against reentrancy and unsupported bond assets.
- Preserve blockchain authority and every applicable protocol invariant.
- Do not add secrets, production credentials, dummy production addresses, backend settlement authority, or Stellar/Freighter runtime dependencies.
Required Tests
- Successful challenge at valid timestamps.
- Early, late, duplicate, finalized, paused, insufficient allowance, and failed-transfer tests.
- Atomicity test for state and custody.
- Run the repository’s complete required Hardhat and Foundry suites and report unrelated pre-existing failures separately.
- Add regression coverage for every defect or unsafe legacy behavior removed by this work.
Acceptance Criteria
Deliverables
- Production-quality Solidity, interfaces, libraries, deployment code, or test code required by the scope.
- Unit and higher-level tests described above.
- NatSpec and contract-specific technical documentation.
- A pull-request summary covering architecture, security analysis, gas or storage impact, migration implications, and residual risks.
- Evidence of commands run and their results.
Dependencies
V2-SC-004 — Implement Versioned Protocol Configuration Registry
V2-SC-009 — Implement Stake Vault Custody and Lock Ledger
V2-SC-015 — Implement Provisional Settlement Engine
This issue must not be assigned while any required dependency is unresolved or incompatible with the reviewed interface version.
Non-Goals
- Resolving the appeal or paying a challenger reward.
- Off-chain adjudication.
- Creating, modifying, reopening, or relabelling historical GitHub issues.
- Applying the external
Stellar Wave label.
Complexity and Review
- Complexity: high
- Repository:
DigiNodes/truthbounty-contract
- Risk: protocol-critical
- Required review: human maintainer review; automatic merge is prohibited
- Candidate state:
wave-candidate
References
- Protocol specification §15
- TruthBounty Protocol V2 Specification
- TruthBounty V2 Engineering Blueprint
- ADR-0001 — Canonical V2 Contract Topology
- Drips Stellar Wave Operations
🏷 Labels
- contracts
- disputes
- protocol-critical
- web3
- complexity-high
- wave-candidate
- staking
- security
V2-SC-016 — Implement Dispute Opening and Challenge Bond Custody
Overview
Implement one valid challenge per claim, exact challenge timing, bond locking, and transition into Disputed.
Problem Context
A provisional result must be challengeable without letting spam or privileged actors halt claims for free. Challenge bonds need the same protected custody guarantees as verifier stake.
This issue belongs to V2-EPIC-SC-001 — Canonical Contract Topology and Deployment. Existing repository issues are historical only; their titles, labels, closure state, or partial implementations do not satisfy this issue.
Technical Scope
The contributor must begin by auditing current files that overlap this scope. Reusable logic may be retained only when it conforms to the governing V2 interfaces, events, authority boundaries, and tests. The pull request must identify reused, replaced, and deprecated paths.
Security and Integrity Requirements
Required Tests
Acceptance Criteria
Deliverables
Dependencies
V2-SC-004— Implement Versioned Protocol Configuration RegistryV2-SC-009— Implement Stake Vault Custody and Lock LedgerV2-SC-015— Implement Provisional Settlement EngineThis issue must not be assigned while any required dependency is unresolved or incompatible with the reviewed interface version.
Non-Goals
Stellar Wavelabel.Complexity and Review
DigiNodes/truthbounty-contractwave-candidateReferences
🏷 Labels