This issue was originally created by @isteinbrecher in https://gitlab.lrz.de/baci/baci/-/issues/889 on 2022-11-14.
Description
Currently, we have two implementations for the structure time integration.
In the past, this has proven to be an obstacle when developing new methods and combining them with existing ones, therefore, the two frameworks have to be unified.
To decide which one of the frameworks should be the "new" and only structural time integration, it is important to know what features of the old and new time integration are currently being used by the 4C developers.
Please add your use cases to the lists below.
If you are unsure which features you use, please ask a colleague for advice. It is very important to have an accurate picture of the current needs of all users.
Features used in the old structural time integration:
Features used in the new structural time integration:
Related Issues and Merge Requests
Interested Parties
Description
Currently, we have two implementations for the structure time integration.
In the past, this has proven to be an obstacle when developing new methods and combining them with existing ones, therefore, the two frameworks have to be unified.
To decide which one of the frameworks should be the "new" and only structural time integration, it is important to know what features of the old and new time integration are currently being used by the 4C developers.
Please add your use cases to the lists below.
If you are unsure which features you use, please ask a colleague for advice. It is very important to have an accurate picture of the current needs of all users.
Features used in the old structural time integration:
Features used in the new structural time integration:
Related Issues and Merge Requests
Interested Parties